|
Electronic Mail. E-mail. Spam. I can’t predict your reaction to these
words, but I can safely assume that they spark some kind of emotional response.
With the possible exception of the cellular phone, no other mode of communication
is as personalized as e-mail. Or as essential. Or as annoying.
I can’t imagine life without e-mail. It is a near-perfect form of communication
for several reasons:
-
E-mail allows the user to send a message at a convenient time and allows
the recipient to receive the message at another convenient time. Unlike
telephone communications, convenient times don’t have to be simultaneous.
I can send an e-mail to a relative in Scotland without worrying about waking
her or catching her out.
-
E-mail, especially cell-phone and Blackberry e-mail has already proved
its worth during a terrorist attack. You have probably already read stories
about people who escaped from the World Trade Center / Pentagon disasters
and were able to message their loved ones using their Blackberry or cell-phone
e-mail. I do not remember the name of the man who spent seven hours walking
home from Washington DC, convinced that World War III had started, but
I’m willing to bet he now owns one or the other.
-
E-mail allows the sender to review and, if necessary, reword the message
before sending. (Experience tells us that users don’t take full advantage
of this feature, but lack of widespread use doesn’t negate its value.)
-
E-mail is a lifeline to the hearing impaired.
-
E-mail enables telecommuting. I have laryngitis today, so I will e-mail
my current client to let her know I won’t be in the office and volunteer
to telecommute. For other clients, telecommuting is my standard method
of exchange, from contract negotiations to invoicing.
-
E-mails can be saved for future reference. I have an e-mail archive in
which I save all my communications with clients and prospective clients.
This information comes in handy when reviewing the terms of a contract,
the client’s wishes for a project, or the names and e-mail addresses of
other persons involved with the project.
-
E-mail makes PC Alamode (and client) deadlines easier to manage.
When I first started writing for PC Alamode I had to snail mail
my articles on floppy disk, meaning that I had to have my articles finished
several days before the deadline, make sure I had a blank floppy disk available,
make sure I had a floppy disk mailer and adequate postage on hand, and
remember my editor’s mailing address. At the time, we could upload to the
Bulletin Board System, but I hadn’t yet figured out how to do it.
With a tool this elegant, we should have scarce room to complain, but complain
we do, and rightly so. Despite all our efforts to protect our privacy,
we are inundated with offers for stock tips, male enhancement, hair growth
remedies and other unsolicited and unwanted commodities. Spam filters exist,
but they don’t seem to put much of a dent in the influx.
Admittedly, I don’t get enough e-mail to worry with Spam filters, but
I do have a question about them. Maybe one of my readers can clue me in:
Is there a Spam filter that allows you to identify friends and family and
put them in an “A” list? This would mean that unidentified e-mails would
go in the “B” list. You would still have to look in the “B” list, but with
a predefined “A” list you would still be able to retrieve your most important
e-mails before dealing with the sludge in the “B” list. When you do look
at the “B” list, you could identify return addresses that should go in
your “A” list, refining your definitions further and further until your
“B” list is likely nothing but Spam.
The e-mail programs I work with take a reverse approach: define mail
from a certain return address as Spam. The problem with this approach,
as we all know, is that Spammers seldom use the same return address twice.
This leaves you chasing them around your e-mail program with your blood
pressure up and never quite getting rid of them. Admittedly, under
the A-List/ B-list method, Spammers still get in, but they are confined
to a less emotionally charged area of your inbox that you can deal with
when you have time to worry with mass deletes.
Spam aside, now that we have been at war, I am particularly thankful
for e-mail, if not for myself, at least for the families who have members
stationed overseas. As the wife of a Vietnam veteran, I admit to a twinge
of jealousy when I hear about how comforting e-mail is to those that go
and those that are left behind.
In 1970, while my husband served in the 18th Combat Engineering Battalion
in Pleiku, my lifeline was the U.S. Postal Service. My daily life was controlled
by the existence and quantity of red, white and blue airmail envelopes
(with the word “free” where the stamp should go) in my mailbox. On a good
day, I would get one. On a great day, I would get several. On a bad day,
I would get none. During a nerve-wracking week, I would see several days
of empty mailboxes.
Twenty-seven years later, when our college-age daughter left for Argentina
for a semester of study abroad, we were able to take advantage of the exhilarating
speed and availability of e-mail. Phone calls were possible, but expensive
and complicated, especially since I’m hearing impaired and my Spanish is
painfully limited (Argentines, it seems don’t understand the dialect of
Spanish they teach in San Antonio.) Laura used the University computer
center to send us messages several times a week, and if we needed an answer
to a question, we could e-mail her in the morning and usually have an answer
by evening.
As I write this, CNN (Cable News Network) offers more evidence of the
amazing power of e-mail. Wolfgang Blitzer relates a rumor that a former
Iraqi government official may have sent a mass e-mail to the remaining
members of Saddam Hussein’s regime telling them to get out while the getting’s
good. Mr. Blitzer cannot confirm whether this is real or apocryphal, but
the absence of government control certainly makes it appear that such a
mailing was sent. How amazing to think that the remainder of a whole regime
could be dispersed using the same mechanism through which we receive Spam.
I related this story on the phone to my husband at work. He doubts that
the Iraqis regime still possessed that kind of technology (if it ever had
it to begin with.) He speculates that the Americans, however, could have
Spammed Saddam’s loyalists.
A recent article by Dan Morse and Jesse Drucker in the Wall Street
Journal, “Soldier Helps 101st Stay Wired to Home,” tells of PFC Dustin
Price who runs Cat 5 cables across the desert floor in order to keep the
members of his and other units (300 soldiers as of the time of the article)
connected to e-mail. If Price can do that, I’m sure he or some other
American technie genius over could put together an e-mal that could get
past Iraqi Spam filters.
|